|
THE COMMUNISTIC SOCIETIES OF THE UNITED STATES
THE COMMUNISTIC SOCIETIES OF THE UNITED STATES CHARLES NORDHOFF TO MY FRIENDS DOCTOR AND MRS. JOHN DAVIS OF CINCINNATI.
[Illustration: VIEWS IN ZOAR.]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS OF THE INQUIRY
THE CONDITION AND NECESSITIES OF LABOR
MISTAKE OF THE TRADES-UNIONS
REASONS FOR IT
LABOR SOCIETIES AS AT PRESENT MANAGED MISCHIEVOUS
THE AMANA SOCIETY
ITS HISTORY AND ORIGIN
AMANA IN 1874
SOCIAL HABITS AND CUSTOMS
RELIGION AND LITERATURE
THE HARMONISTS AT ECONOMY
ECONOMY IN 1874
HISTORY OF THE HARMONY SOCIETY
ITS RELIGIOUS CREED
PRACTICAL LIFE
SOME PARTICULARS OF "FATHER RAPP"
THE SEPARATISTS OF ZOAR
ORIGIN AND HISTORY
THEIR RELIGIOUS FAITH
PRACTICAL LIFE AND PRESENT CONDITION
THE SHAKERS
"MOTHER ANN"
THE ORDER OF LIFE AMONG THE SHAKERS
A VISIT TO MOUNT LEBANON
DETAILS OF ALL THE SHAKER SOCIETIES
SHAKER LITERATURE
"SPIRITUAL MANIFESTATIONS"
THE ONEIDA AND WALLINGFORD PERFECTIONISTS
ORIGIN AND HISTORY
THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEF
DAILY LIFE AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
SUNDAY AT ONEIDA
"CRITICISM" AND "PRAYER-CURES"
THE AURORA AND BETHEL COMMUNES
AURORA IN OREGON
BETHEL IN MISSOURI
THEIR HISTORY AND RELIGIOUS FAITH
THE ICARIANS
THE BISHOP HILL COLONY
ITS ORIGIN AND HISTORY
CAUSES OF ITS FAILURE
THE CEDAR VALE COMMUNE
THE SOCIAL FREEDOM COMMUNITY
THREE COLONIES--NOT COMMUNISTIC
ANAHEIM IN CALIFORNIA
VINELAND IN NEW JERSEY
SILKVILLE PRAIRIE HOME IN KANSAS
COMPARATIVE VIEW AND REVIEW
STATISTICAL
COMMUNAL POLITICS AND POLITICAL ECONOMY
CHARACTER OF THE PEOPLE
INFLUENCES OF COMMUNISTIC LIFE
CONDITIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF COMMUNISTIC LIVING
BIBLIOGRAPHY
INDEX
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
VIEWS IN ZOAR
MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF COMMUNISTIC SOCIETIES
GRACE BEFORE MEAT--AMANA
SCHOOL-HOUSE--AMANA
AMANA A GENERAL VIEW
CHURCH AT AMANA
INTERIOR VIEW OF CHURCH
PLAN OF THE INSPIRATIONIST VILLAGES
ASSEMBLY HALL--ECONOMY
CHURCH AT ECONOMY
A STREET VIEW IN ECONOMY
FATHER RAPP'S HOUSE--ECONOMY
CHURCH AT ZOAR SCHOOL-HOUSE AT ZOAR
A GROUP OF SHAKERS
THE FIRST SHAKER CHURCH AT MOUNT LEBANON
SHAKER ARCHITECTURE--MOUNT LEBANON
SHAKER ARCHITECTURE--ENFIELD N. H.
SHAKER WOMEN AT WORK
SHAKER COSTUMES
SHAKER WORSHIP.--THE DANCE
SISTERS IN EVERY-DAY COSTUME
ELDER FREDERICK W. EVANS
VIEW OF A SHAKER VILLAGE
THE HERB-HOUSE--MOUNT LEBANON
MEETING-HOUSE AT MOUNT LEBANON
INTERIOR OF MEETING-HOUSE AT MOUNT LEBANON
SHAKER TANNERY--MOUNT LEBANON
SHAKER OFFICE AND STORE AT MOUNT LEBANON
A SHAKER ELDER
A GROUP OF SHAKER CHILDREN
SHAKER DINING-HALL
A SHAKER SCHOOL
SHAKER MUSIC-HALL
J. H. NOYES FOUNDER OF THE PERFECTIONISTS
COSTUMES AT ONEIDA
THE BETHEL COMMUNE MISSOURI
CHURCH AT BETHEL MISSOURI
[Illustration: MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF COMMUNISTIC SOCIETIES.]
INTRODUCTION
Though it is probable that for a long time to come the mass of mankind
in civilized countries will find it both necessary and advantageous to
labor for wages and to accept the condition of hired laborers (or as
it has absurdly become the fashion to say employees) every thoughtful
and kind-hearted person must regard with interest any device or plan
which promises to enable at least the more intelligent enterprising
and determined part of those who are not capitalists to become such and
to cease to labor for hire.
Nor can any one doubt the great importance both to the security of the
capitalists and to the intelligence and happiness of the
non-capitalists (if I may use so awkward a word) of increasing the
number of avenues to independence for the latter. For the character and
conduct of our own population in the United States show conclusively
that nothing so stimulates intelligence in the poor and at the same
time nothing so well enables them to bear the inconveniences of their
lot as a reasonable prospect that with industry and economy they may
raise themselves out of the condition of hired laborers into that of
independent employers of their own labor. Take away entirely the grounds
of such a hope and a great mass of our poorer people would gradually
sink into stupidity and a blind discontent which education would only
increase until they became a danger to the state; for the greater their
intelligence the greater would be the dissatisfaction with their
situation--just as we see that the dissemination of education among the
English agricultural laborers (by whom of all classes in Christendom
independence is least to be hoped for) has lately aroused these
sluggish beings to strikes and a struggle for a change in their
condition.
Hitherto in the United States our cheap and fertile lands have acted
as an important safety-valve for the enterprise and discontent of our
non-capitalist population. Every hired workman knows that if he chooses
to use economy and industry in his calling he may without great or
insurmountable difficulty establish himself in independence on the
public lands; and in fact a large proportion of our most energetic and
intelligent mechanics do constantly seek these lands where with patient
toil they master nature and adverse circumstances often make fortunate
and honorable careers and at the worst leave their children in an
improved condition of life. I do not doubt that the eagerness of some of
our wisest public men for the acquisition of new territory has arisen
from their conviction that this opening for the independence of laboring
men was essential to the security of our future as a free and peaceful
state. For though not one in a hundred or even one in a thousand of
our poorer and so-called laboring class may choose to actually achieve
independence by taking up and tilling a portion of the public lands it
is plain that the knowledge that any one may do so makes those who do
not more contented with their lot which they thus feel to be one of
choice and not of compulsion.
Any circumstance as the exhaustion of these lands which should
materially impair this opportunity for independence would be I
believe a serious calamity to our country; and the spirit of the
Trades-Unions and International Societies appears to me peculiarly
mischievous and hateful because they seek to eliminate from the
thoughts of their adherents the hope or expectation of independence. The
member of a Trades-Union is taught to regard himself and to act toward
society as a hireling for life; and these societies are united not as
men seeking a way to exchange dependence for independence but as
hirelings determined to remain such and only demanding better
conditions of their masters. If it were possible to infuse with this
spirit all or the greater part of the non-capitalist class in the United
States this would I believe be one of the gravest calamities which
could befall us as a nation; for it would degrade the mass of our
voters and make free government here very difficult if it did not
entirely change the form of our government and expose us to lasting
disorders and attacks upon property.
We see already that in whatever part of our country the Trades-Union
leaders have succeeded in imposing themselves upon mining or
manufacturing operatives the results are the corruption of our
politics a lowering of the standard of intelligence and independence
among the laborers and an unreasoning and unreasonable discontent
which in its extreme development despises right and seeks only
changes degrading to its own class at the cost of injury and loss to
the general public.
The Trades-Unions and International Clubs have become a formidable power
in the United States and Great Britain but so far it is a power almost
entirely for evil. They have been able to disorganize labor and to
alarm capital. They have succeeded in a comparatively few cases in
temporarily increasing the wages and in diminishing the hours of labor
in certain branches of industry--a benefit so limited both as to
duration and amount that it cannot justly be said to have inured to the
general advantage of the non-capitalist class. On the other hand they
have debased the character and lowered the moral tone of their
membership by the narrow and cold-blooded selfishness of their spirit
and doctrines and have thus done an incalculable harm to society; and
moreover they have by alarming capital lessened the wages fund
seriously checked enterprise and thus decreased the general prosperity
of their own class. For it is plain that to no one in society is the
abundance of capital and its free and secure use in all kinds of
enterprises so vitally important as to the laborer for wages--to the
Trades-Unionist.
To assert necessary and eternal enmity between labor and capital would
seem to be the extreme of folly in men who have predetermined to remain
laborers for wages all their lives and who therefore mean to be
peculiarly dependent on capital. Nor are the Unions wiser or more
reasonable toward their fellow-laborers; for each Union aims by
limiting the number of apprentices a master may take and by other
equally selfish regulations to protect its own members against
competition forgetting apparently that if you prevent men from becoming
bricklayers a greater number must seek to become carpenters; and that
thus by its exclusive policy a Union only plays what Western gamblers
call a "cut-throat game" with the general laboring population. For if
the system of Unions were perfect and each were able to enforce its
policy of exclusion a great mass of poor creatures driven from every
desirable employment would be forced to crowd into the lowest and least
paid. I do not know where one could find so much ignorance contempt for
established principles and cold-blooded selfishness as among the
Trades-Unions and International Societies of the United States and Great
Britain--unless one should go to France. While they retain their present
spirit they might well take as their motto the brutal and stupid saying
of a French writer that "Mankind are engaged in a war for bread in
which every man's hand is at his brother's throat." Directly they offer
a prize to incapacity and robbery compelling their ablest members to do
no more than the least able and spoiling the aggregate wealth of
society by burdensome regulations restricting labor. Logically to the
Trades-Union leaders the Chicago or Boston fire seemed a more beneficial
event than the invention of the steam-engine; for plenty seems to them a
curse and scarcity the greatest blessing. [Transcriber's Note: Lengthy
footnote relocated to chapter end.]
Any organization which teaches its adherents to accept as inevitable for
themselves and for the mass of a nation the condition of hirelings and
to conduct their lives on that premise is not only wrong but an injury
to the community. Mr. Mill wisely says on this point in his chapter on
"The Future of the Laboring Classes": "There can be little doubt that
the _status_ of hired laborers will gradually tend to confine itself
to the description of work-people whose low moral qualities render them
unfit for any thing more independent; and that the relation of masters
and work-people will be gradually superseded by partnership in one of
two forms: in some cases association of the laborers with the
capitalist; in others and perhaps finally in all association of
laborers among themselves." I imagine that the change he speaks of will
be very slow and gradual; but it is important that all doors shall be
left open for it and Trades-Unions would close every door.
Professor Cairnes in his recent contribution to Political Economy goes
further even than Mr. Mill and argues that a change of this nature is
inevitable. He remarks: "The modifications which occur in the
distribution of capital among its several departments as nations
advance are by no means fortuitous but follow on the whole a
well-defined course and move toward a determinate goal. In effect what
we find is a constant growth of the national capital accompanied with a
nearly equally constant decline in the proportion of this capital which
goes to support productive labor.... Though the fund for the
remuneration of mere labor whether skilled or unskilled must so long
as industry is progressive ever bear a constantly diminishing
proportion alike to the growing wealth and growing capital there is
nothing in the nature of things which restricts the laboring population
to this fund for their support. In return indeed for their mere labor
it is to this that they must look for their sole reward; but _they may
help production otherwise than by their labor: they may save and thus
become themselves the owners of capital;_ and profits may thus be
brought to aid the wages-fund." [Footnote: "Some Leading Principles of
Political Economy Newly Expounded." By J. E. Cairnes M.A. New York
Harper & Brothers.]
Aside from systematized emigration to unsettled or thinly peopled
regions which the Trades-Unions of Europe ought to organize on a great
scale but which they have entirely neglected the other outlets for the
mass of dissatisfied hand-laborers lie through co-operative or
communistic efforts. Co-operative societies flourish in England and
Germany. We have had a number of them in this country also but their
success has not been marked; and I have found it impossible to get
statistical returns even of their numbers. If the Trades-Unions had used
a tenth of the money they have wasted in futile efforts to shorten hours
of labor and excite their members to hatred indolence and waste in
making public the statistics and the possibilities of co-operation they
would have achieved some positive good.
But while co-operative efforts have generally failed in the United
States we have here a number of successful Communistic Societies
pursuing agriculture and different branches of manufacturing and I have
thought it useful to examine these to see if their experience offers
any useful hints toward the solution of the labor question. Hitherto
very little indeed almost nothing definite and precise has been made
known concerning these societies; and Communism remains loudly but very
vaguely spoken of by friends as well as enemies and is commonly a word
either of terror or of contempt in the public prints.
In the following pages will be found accordingly an account of the
COMMUNISTIC SOCIETIES now existing in the United States made from
personal visit and careful examination; and including for each its
social customs and expedients; its practical and business methods; its
system of government; the industries it pursues; its religious creed and
practices; as well as its present numbers and condition and its
history.
It appears to me an important fact that these societies composed for
the most part of men originally farmers or mechanics--people of very
limited means and education--have yet succeeded in accumulating
considerable wealth and at any rate a satisfactory provision for their
own old age and disability and for the education of their children or
successors. In every case they have developed among their membership
very remarkable business ability considering their original station in
life; they have found among themselves leaders wise enough to rule and
skill sufficient to enable them to establish and carry on not merely
agricultural operations but also manufactures and to conduct
successfully complicated business affairs.
Some of these societies have existed fifty some twenty-five and some
for nearly eighty years. All began with small means; and some are now
very wealthy. Moreover while some of these communes are still living
under the guidance of their founders others equally successful have
continued to prosper for many years after the death of their original
leaders. Some are celibate; but others inculcate or at least permit
marriage. Some gather their members into a common or "unitary" dwelling;
but others with no less success maintain the family relation and the
separate household.
It seemed to me that the conditions of success vary sufficiently among
these societies to make their histories at least interesting and
perhaps important. I was curious too to ascertain if their success
depended upon obscure conditions not generally attainable as
extraordinary ability in a leader; or undesirable as religious
fanaticism or an unnatural relation of the sexes; or whether it might
not appear that the conditions absolutely necessary to success were only
such as any company of carefully selected and reasonably determined men
and women might hope to command.
I desired also to discover how the successful Communists had met and
overcome the difficulties of idleness selfishness and unthrift in
individuals which are commonly believed to make Communism impossible
and which are well summed up in the following passage in Mr. Mill's
chapter on Communism:
"The objection ordinarily made to a system of community of property and
equal distribution of the produce that each person would be incessantly
occupied in evading his fair share of the work points undoubtedly to
a real difficulty. But those who urge this objection forget to how great
an extent the same difficulty exists under the system on which nine
tenths of the business of society is now conducted. The objection
supposes that honest and efficient labor is only to be had from those
who are themselves individually to reap the benefit of their own
exertions. But how small a part of all the labor performed in England
from the lowest paid to the highest is done by persons working for
their own benefit. From the Irish reaper or hodman to the chief justice
or the minister of state nearly all the work of society is remunerated
by day wages or fixed salaries. A factory operative has less personal
interest in his work than a member of a Communist association since he
is not like him working for a partnership of which he is himself a
member. It will no doubt be said that though the laborers themselves
have not in most cases a personal interest in their work they are
watched and superintended and their labor directed and the mental part
of the labor performed by persons who have. Even this however is far
from being universally the fact. In all public and many of the largest
and most successful private undertakings not only the labors of detail
but the control and superintendence are entrusted to salaried officers.
And though the 'master's eye' when the master is vigilant and
intelligent is of proverbial value it must be remembered that in a
Socialist farm or manufactory each laborer would be under the eye not
of one master but of the whole community. In the extreme case of
obstinate perseverance in not performing the due share of work the
community would have the same resources which society now has for
compelling conformity to the necessary conditions of the association.
Dismissal the only remedy at present is no remedy when any other
laborer who may be engaged does no better than his predecessor: the
power of dismissal only enables an employer to obtain from his workmen
the customary amount of labor but that customary labor may be of any
degree of inefficiency. Even the laborer who loses his employment by
idleness or negligence has nothing worse to suffer in the most
unfavorable case than the discipline of a workhouse and if the desire
to avoid this be a sufficient motive in the one system it would be
sufficient in the other. I am not undervaluing the strength of the
incitement given to labor when the whole or a large share of the benefit
of extra exertion belongs to the laborer. But under the present system
of industry this incitement in the great majority of cases does not
exist. If communistic labor might be less vigorous than that of a
peasant proprietor or a workman laboring on his own account it would
probably be more energetic than that of a laborer for hire who has no
personal interest in the matter at all. The neglect by the uneducated
classes of laborers for hire of the duties which they engage to perform
is in the present state of society most flagrant. Now it is an admitted
condition of the communist scheme that all shall be educated; and this
being supposed the duties of the members of the association would
doubtless be as diligently performed as those of the generality of
salaried officers in the middle or higher classes; who are not supposed
to be necessarily unfaithful to their trust because so long as they are
not dismissed their pay is the same in however lax a manner their duty
is fulfilled. Undoubtedly as a general rule remuneration by fixed
salaries does not in any class of functionaries produce the maximum of
zeal; and this is as much as can be reasonably alleged against
communistic labor.
"That even this inferiority would necessarily exist is by no means so
certain as is assumed by those who are little used to carry their minds
beyond the state of things with which they are familiar....
"Another of the objections to Communism is similar to that so often
urged against poor-laws: that if every member of the community were
assured of subsistence for himself and any number of children on the
sole condition of willingness to work prudential restraint on the
multiplication of mankind would be at an end and population would start
forward at a rate which would reduce the community through successive
stages of increasing discomfort to actual starvation. There would
...
|
Unpublished Work 
